1/10/2023 0 Comments Audirvana plus coupon codeHave you done this because you are annoyed by something in the frequency response of the R2R 7, or just because you like to tweak and optimize? I guess I am asking if you are constantly tweaking because something in the response becomes annoying after listening for a while.ģ) I currently feed my reference 7 via it's SPDIF input, from either a Berkeley Alpha USB converter, or a Prism Sound Orpheus interface. For those who have upgraded, do you still get the feeling of good low-end weight from the R2R 7?Ģ) I've noticed that a couple of people on this thread have gone through a lot of tweaking and fiddling to get the best performance possible out of their R2R 7. From the descriptions I've read about the R2R 7, it seems that it may have a more linear frequency response. I have some questions for those of you who have the R2R 7.ġ) One thing I like about the Reference 7 is the low end weight in the bass. I have the version 5 of the DSP-1 on the Reference 7. I am considering an R2R 7 as an upgrade of my Reference 7 that I bought back in 2010. The sound has even got organic, which for me is a huge plus and what sets the r2r 7 apart. ![]() I don't find any flaw with the sound i get and for me, this is worth the extra money. To feed a 2500usd dac, it is very reasonnable. I would be down to around 450 usd including the usb cable. I would have to take them out of the equation and see what i get from the Amanero. As for the f-1 and Schiit Wyrd, they do not make such significant difference last time i checked. My point is the intona can improve most setups, meaning the vast majority of dacs, whatever they cost. With the new isolator found on the newer r2r 7, perhaps you get close to what i get now, but i doubt it. With the intona, or just the Eitr with a proper coax cable, a potential groud loop is eliminated. I find it normal to have to isolate the pc somehow cause it is a major source of noise. In my view, the only real problem with the r2r 7 is the accurate fw should sound a little less aggressive, because the dynamics this fw brings to the mix are welcome. Or a Schiit Eitr with digital cable (380usd). But i could perhaps get better results still with a just modded su-1, using nothing else. Can't stand the on dac upsamping with the accurate fw.Īll in all, my usb chain costs around 800 usd, i admit. Only, i am using the accurate fw, while having audirvana doing all the OS. But perhaps one can do without the Regen before it and still sound good enough. Or one can try the modified SU-1 that cleans up the AC pwr: For me the whole painful effort of playing downloaded music (instead of CD/SACD) is to get super Hi-RES! Really, I would not bother to get DSD64 for computer audio which is same as SACD, So DSD256 or DXD etc.įor the SU-1, there has been comments that the AC power can dirty the pathway again so some people recommend converting it to pure DC using LPS but that seems really complicated and needs some DIY mod. Mano ultra seems promising but can only do stereo and limits the DSD to 64 I think (why?!!). Ideally a music streamer/player with dedicated I2S feeding into DAC directly is best, and most simple. If I don't want DSD, this may be best solution: It seems like there is a conspiracy to avoid the best sound by not allowing I2S input so it never sounds at its best and so one will need to buy more USB conditioners etc. I am surprised why even expensive DAC do not have I2S. It also does not do native DSD but DoP though apparently that does not affect sound. ![]() USB is crap for audio in general, so I heard. ![]() Click to expand.I2S should be best, in theory and I suppose if implemented properly with transformers (like the Singxir Su-1), but I have never used I2S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |